Three weeks after the agreement
The Melkart Protocol had been reached on May 17, 1973. The Lebanese Army and Palestinian factions had exchanged written commitments on heavy weapons, camp security, training locations, and the operational posture of the fedayeen inside Lebanon. It was supposed to be the end of the May crisis.
On June 8, 1973 — three weeks later — the Secretary General of the Lebanese Foreign Office summoned the U.S. Chargé and read him an intelligence dossier. None of the Melkart commitments had been implemented. Instead, the situation had gotten worse.
The arms supply
Iraq had offered the fedayeen 6,000 individual weapons. Two thousand Kalashnikov rifles had arrived at the Syrian port of Latakia, from the USSR, addressed in Arafat's name. A top-level fedayeen meeting on May 21–22 had decided how to distribute the weapons when they reached Lebanon: 4,000 to fedayeen units, and 4,000 to Lebanese leftist groups described as "nationalist" or "progressive" forces. Jordanian intelligence added that three fedayeen were being sent to Baghdad to arrange the purchase and delivery of 930 wire-guided anti-tank rockets for a new rocket unit to be emplaced near the Syrian-Lebanese border crossing at Masnaa.
The arithmetic was not subtle. Half of the incoming fedayeen arms inventory was going to Lebanese militia formations, not to Palestinian fighters. This was the material base of an armed alliance between the PLO and indigenous Lebanese leftist factions — the physical assembly of what would, two years later, become the Lebanese National Movement.
The payments
Paragraph 4 of the cable contains the most detailed information in the pre-war archive about direct financial relations between Arafat's Fatah and Lebanese political figures. The list is specific: LL 250,000 to Grand Mufti Shaykh Hassan Khaled; LL 500,000 to leftist former deputy Adnan Hakim; LL 100,000 to Shia leader Imam Musa Sadr; LL 500,000 to Druze leftist Kamal Jumblatt. The payments crossed confessional lines. The paymaster, the cable reports, was Abu Jihad — Khalil al-Wazir — operating from the Fatah treasury at Nabatiyeh.
These were substantial sums. In 1973 Lebanese pounds, they translate to roughly USD 30,000 to USD 150,000 per recipient at contemporary exchange rates — meaningful political financing by any measure, and especially so for a religious scholar (the Grand Mufti) or for a political figure whose public identity rested on principled independence (Musa Sadr).
The Syrian campaign
In parallel, Sadaqa documented a Syrian information operation. The Syrian Foreign Minister had refused to answer substantive questions from his Lebanese counterpart over four or five contacts in a week, limiting himself to minor specific grievances like the temporary arrest of three Syrians on June 6. But in Damascus, visiting Lebanese politicians — including the Maronite Raymond Eddé, the Abdullah Yafi group, and Arab League Secretary-General Mahmoud Riad — were being told by top Syrian officials that the Lebanese government was preparing another armed attack to liquidate the fedayeen.
The Embassy's assessment was that this was a pretext-manufacturing operation. The Syrian allegation — that Lebanon was planning to liquidate the fedayeen — could serve either as justification for subsequent Syrian military action, or as a means to convince the fedayeen they were genuinely threatened and drive them into preemptive action of their own. The cable names this mechanism. It does not wait for scholarly retrospective to identify the pattern.
The diplomatic ask
Sadaqa asked the United States to raise the Lebanese-Syrian-fedayeen question with the Soviet Union. The Lebanese government explicitly did not intend to raise it with the Soviet Ambassador in Beirut — because, Sadaqa said, the Lebanese had learned the hard way that they could not place any stock in what Ambassador Azimov said. Soviet words and Soviet deeds, in the Lebanese assessment, did not correspond.
He coupled this with a direct request: urgent U.S. weapons for the Lebanese Army. The intelligence dossier and the arms request were delivered in the same meeting. The cable captures them in the same text. The connection between them was not rhetorical but operational: the Lebanese state, facing the arms flow and political payments documented in the preceding paragraphs, was asking the United States for matching military assistance.
What the record shows
This cable is the pre-war Lebanese financial and logistical record. It documents, on the factual level, what the political-assessment cables (1973BEIRUT05437, 1973STATE086221) described at the level of judgment: a coordinated Syrian-Palestinian-Soviet-Iraqi system of arms and money flowing through Lebanon to destabilize Lebanese state sovereignty. The recipients were named. The amounts were specified. The paymaster — Abu Jihad — was identified. The ports and border crossings were located.
None of this appears in the standard historical account of pre-war Lebanon. It is in the documentary record because a Lebanese Secretary General read it aloud to a U.S. Chargé on the morning of June 8, 1973, and the Chargé's cable preserved it.